FANDOM


  • You know that argument? Well, User:IAmMaxB keeps on undoing my edits. He or She admitted it Himself/Herself. Proof: Thread:14098

      Loading editor
    • I don't know what to do, because I don't want to go into another revert war with anybody.

        Loading editor
    • I disagree with Max's choice to ignore conversation. If there is a specific edit you want me to look at, let me know.

      Going over Max's recent contributions:

      • I agree with Max that files that are fan art should be deleted.
      • I disagree with removing the TV series image in "Madame Lulu's Library". Though the image could be cropped better (or screenshot instead of photo of TV screen).
      • Again for "Woman with Hair but No Beard" & "Man With a Beard But No Hair", I agree with Max removing fanart.
      • For Ellington Feint theory being "Woman with Hair but No Beard" - it's speculation.
        • I personally disagree with adding speculation but I know other users, like Alex, take a much more liberal view of including fan theories.
        • However, if you must add fan theories, only add them in "Trivia" section (if there isn't a "Trivia" section in the article, then add one). The rest of the article should focus on canon, not fan theories. Also, start the bullet point with "Some fans speculate" to make it clear that it's a fan theory (since a lot of characters, including Lemony, have their own theories "Some people think" does not make clear that the statement does not come from canon).
      • For "Larry the Waiter", I believe it's fine to add Lawrence bullet point in Trivia section. However, it should say "might be" since plenty of parents officially name their children with a shortened name, so Larry's full given name might be "Larry", not Lawrence. Thus I would phrase it: "Larry is a diminutive of Lawrence, so Larry's full given name might be Lawrence."
      • "The Schism", again, speculation. Alex has fixed up most of the text, but I would add "Fans theorize the possible cause to have been:" or something in that manner. If it's not a fan theory, i.e. the theory is presented in the book, then it should say whose theory it is, e.g. "Violet theorizes the schism might have been caused by ..."
        Loading editor
    • I just wanted to say that putting the fan art of The Man With A Beard But No Hair and The Woman With Hair But No Beard in the info box is wrong, and that you should put it in the gallery section like it is for other Characters.

        Loading editor
    • Fan art isn't allowed on the wiki in any sections per policy. What pages are you seeing with fan art in gallery?

        Loading editor
    • Of Calagari Carnival in the gallery and of Esmé Squalor in the trivia section.

        Loading editor
    • Concept art is NOT fan art. From wikipedia, "Concept art is a form of illustration used to convey an idea for use in films, video games, animation, comic books, or other media before it is put into the final product." These are official images used in the production of the TV series. They were not created by random fans. Concept art is allowed on the wiki, fan art is not.

        Loading editor
    • Oh, sorry about that. But the pictures that TANAZ2007 was putting on the MWBBNH and the WWHBNB pages was Fan Art of them, not Concept Art.

        Loading editor
    • Yes, the image TANAZ2007 was adding was fan art, which is not allowed by the wiki.

        Loading editor
    • I am sorry. I will fix up the fan theories, and delete the pictures.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.